Wearing heels is a choice. I like wearing them from time to time, but not all the time. It is painful to wear them longer than a four hour party once a week, never mind nine hours every day at work.
And yet there are knuckle draggers out there who seem to "think" women can still be objectified, and fired or not paid if they reject abuse and double standards. Nicola Thorp's question is perfectly valid: Would men be required to work all day wearing shoes that are painful, uncomfortable and (in most workplaces) physically unsafe? If men aren't required to, why are women required to wear them?
London receptionist 'sent home for not wearing heels'The company is now "reviewing their policy", but only after public shaming and the potential of legal and financial damages. They certainly aren't changing policy because they view women as human beings.
Temp worker Nicola Thorp, 27, from Hackney, arrived at finance company PwC to be told she had to wear shoes with a "2in to 4in heel".
When she refused and complained male colleagues were not asked to do the same, she was sent home without pay.
Outsourcing firm Portico said Ms Thorp had "signed the appearance guidelines" but it would now review them.